Skip to main content
· 7/25/1994

Harriette Williams Downey, Mark A. Vander Laan, Attorney-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Michael A. Clauder, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 30 F.3d 681
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18622
  • 1994 WL 382469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an order that did not “specify] a date” or command the contemnor “to act immediately” was not definite and specific
  • stating that because the district court “failed to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the [parties’ settlement] agreement when entering judgment, [the defendant’s] breach of contract claim was properly addressed in a separate proceeding”
  • finding, based on a strict application of the holding in Kokkonen, that the district court lacked jurisdiction to enforce the parties' settlement agreement because it failed specifically to \retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the agreement when entering judgment\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Suhrheinrich, Daughtrey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.