Harriet F. Laflamme v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Joseph Keating , Respondent-Intervenor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While FERC disputes LaFlamme’s contentions, nowhere does FERC explain why LaFlamme’s points do not suffice to create a public controversy based on potential environmental consequences. NEPA requires such a well-reasoned explanation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).