Harriet Cohen v. City of Des Plaines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a court must determine whether the record 9 contains outstanding conflicts that must be resolved before crediting a claimant’s testimony and 10 entering a finding of disability
• distinguishing ease from Bullock because, in present case, free exercise concerns existed and law did not burden non-beneficiaries
• \It is not up to legislatures (or to courts for that matter) to say what activities are sufficiently `religious'\
• “[0]ur inquiry ... under the [Establishment Clause] necessarily ‘calls for line-drawing; no fixed, per se rule can be framed.’ ”
• “It is not up to legislatures (or to courts for that matter) to say what activities are sufficiently ‘religious’ ”
• “The religious component of child care and education activities in[the city] will come from church members or leaders, not from government officials”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).