Harridge v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• GBI laboratory part of prosecution team due to its testing of defendant’s blood and victim’s blood and urine
• GBI laboratory part of prosecution team due to its testing of defendant's blood and victim's blood and urine
• officer could testify he saw seized physical evidence in plain view even though the physical evidence seized without a warrant was properly suppressed
• given Georgia Bureau of Investigation laboratory’s involvement in case, laboratory was part of prosecution team for Brady purposes
• “For purposes oí Brady, we decide whether someone is on the prosecution team on a case-by-case basis by reviewing the interaction, cooperation and dependence of the agents working on the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).