Harrell v. McKinley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even 67 when there is only one accomplice and only one co-defendant is on trial with the declarant, the use of a non-specific . . . pronoun is acceptable.”
• “A statement [that does not incriminate by direct and obvious implication] normally is admissible . . . even though it alludes non-specifically to the declarant’s confederates and the non- declarant co-defendant may be linked to it by other, properly admitted evidence of his guilt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).