Harral v. McGaha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that any prejudice to defendant was extenuated by his role in requesting the delay
• concluding that “the State acquiesced in a delay . . . because the newly assigned judge and prosecutor were unfamiliar with the case”
• concluding that “any prejudice to [defendant] was extenuated by his role in requesting the delay”
• concluding that “[a]ny prejudice to [defendant] was extenuated by his role in requesting the delay”
• recognizing that “the act of pointing a loaded gun at someone and shooting it toward that person at close range demonstrates an intent to kill”
• holding that an unlawful entry into a home with the intent to commit murder satisfies the burglary element of capital murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).