Skip to main content
· 2/28/2007

Harrah v. State

Citations

  • 949 So. 2d 1142
  • 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2724
  • 2007 WL 597376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when “a statute, with reference to one subject contains a given provision, the omission of such provision from a similar statute concerning a related subject ... is significant to show that a different intention existed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Lewis, Padovano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.