Skip to main content
· 1/9/1996

Harr v. City of Edina

Citations

  • 541 N.W.2d 603
  • 1996 Minn. App. LEXIS 13
  • 1996 WL 5667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While evidence of prejudice is not always essential to the application of laches, it is a circumstance of importance in determining whether a plaintiffs delay was reasonable.”
  • “While evidence of prejudice is not always essential to the application of laches, it is a 9 circumstance of importance in determining whether a plaintiff’s delay was reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klaphake, Toussaint, Harten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.