· 1/9/1996
Harr v. City of Edina
Citations
- 541 N.W.2d 603
- 1996 Minn. App. LEXIS 13
- 1996 WL 5667
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “While evidence of prejudice is not always essential to the application of laches, it is a circumstance of importance in determining whether a plaintiffs delay was reasonable.”
- “While evidence of prejudice is not always essential to the application of laches, it is a 9 circumstance of importance in determining whether a plaintiff’s delay was reasonable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klaphake, Toussaint, Harten
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.