Harpole Architects, P.C. v. Barlow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that “emotional distress derive[d] from the harm to [the corporation] . . . cannot provide standing”
• recognizing the same and noting that, in this circumstance, “shareholders are suing to enforce their own rights, not the corporation’s”
• acknowledging that, for injuries to be recoverable, a complaint must allege “a ‘special injury’ that does not derive from the injury to the corporation”
• explaining that where conversion by former bookkeeper was an injury to the corporation, bookkeeper's misrepresentation, which was made to hide the conversion of corporate funds, caused a separate injury to Harpole
• explaining that where conversion by former bookkeeper was an injury to the corporation, bookkeeper's misrepresentation, which was made to hide the conversion of corporate funds, caused a separate injury to Harpole
• explaining that where conversion by former bookkeeper was an injury to the corporation, bookkeeper's misrepresentation, which was made to hide the conversion of corporate funds, caused a separate injury to Harpole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).