Skip to main content
· 7/28/1983

Harpham v. State

Citations

  • 435 So. 2d 375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • proofs were insufficient to show that starter gun with plugged barrel which required drilling in order to expel a projectile was a firearm within the meaning of section 790.001(6)
  • starter’s pistol is not a firearm or other deadly weapon as defined in armed robbery statute absent proof that pistol could expel projectile from barrel, or was readily convertible for that purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.