Skip to main content
· 6/16/1989

Harpham v. General Casualty Co.

Citations

  • 441 N.W.2d 600
  • 232 Neb. 568
  • 1989 Neb. LEXIS 281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • due process requirements may control the type of evidence that is admissible in a workers’ compensation case
  • due process requirements may control the type of evidence that is admissible in a workers' compensation case
  • Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court is not bound by “common-law or statutory rules of evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.