Harper v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that control was demonstrated when an employee was “permitted to exercise discretion [but] control remained with the Defendants.”
• holding that an employment relationship was intended to be permanent despite no contract governing the terms of employment and an employment period lasting only six weeks
• noting that training only developed the baseline job skills and was not sufficiently “special” to make worker an independent contractor
• holding this factor favors employment when salary is unrelated to an employer’s profit or loss and poor work performance and could only lead to termination
• Field Supervisor who oversaw security guards for a company that “provid[ed] security guards” was integral to business
• “Regardless of Harper’s performance, she would still receive the same bi- monthly salary... .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).