Harper v. State Bar of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘[A]t the very least, a misrepresentation must be intentional in order to satisfy [this exception].’” (second alteration in original
• “We believe that Section 504 thus contemplates an award of expert fees to the prevailing party in its assumption of the rights and remedies of the Civil Rights Act.”
• “The doctrine of qualified immunity shields officials acting and sued in their individual capacities.”
• “We decline to hold ... that action which constitutes the basis for the IDEA claim itself can, absent more, satisfy the exception to the statute of limitations; doing so would allow the exception to become the rule, and the limitations period would be all but eliminated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).