Skip to main content
· 10/5/2006

Harper v. Potter

Citations

  • 456 F. Supp. 2d 25
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72401
  • 2006 WL 2831031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “no reasonable employee would have been dissuaded” by a record of discipline that “remained part of [the plaintiff’s] personnel record for the briefest of periods”
  • holding “no reasonable employee would have been dissuaded” by a record of discipline that “remained part of [the plaintiff’s] personnel record for the briefest of periods”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.