Harper v. International Union, United Mine Workers of America Pension Trust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “any detention incident to the lawful search of [the plaintiff’s] vehicle [could not] give rise to a Fourth Amendment violation”
• collecting cases for principle that abusive language during police search and seizure is not actionable as a § 1983 claim
• finding police 13 Plaintiff argues that Carter’s inability to recall the names in 2017 does not demonstrate that she did not know the names in 2011. (Pl.’s Mem. at 18.
• deeming admitted numerous factual allegations in defendant’s 56.1 Statement to which plaintiff responded by “deny[ing] knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the[ir] truth” (alterations in original)
• “The existence of probable cause is a complete defense to a claim of malicious prosecution in New York.” (citation omitted)
• “[The] [p]laintiffs have failed to oppose [the] [d]efendants’ motion [for certain claims]. . . . Therefore, [the] [p]aintiffs are deemed to have abandoned such claims, and they are hereby dismissed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).