Harper v. Harper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• use of parol evidence to prove the existence of a revocation clause in a subsequent will “cannot be tolerated because it puts us in danger of returning to the days of revocation by oral declaration”
• use of parol evidence to prove the existence of a revocation clause in a subsequent will “cannot be tolerated because it puts us in danger of returning to the days of revocation by oral declaration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Milbourne v. Milbourne
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-05-01· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Payne v. Payne
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1957-10-11· cited 12×
• Driver v. Sheffield
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1955-02-14· cited 11×
• Cash v. Cash
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1956-06-12· cited 6×
• Rawlins v. Hulme
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-02-12· cited 2×
• Miller v. Marchman
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1958-09-05· cited 1×