· 9/2/1986
Harper v. Ethridge
Citations
- 348 S.E.2d 374
- 290 S.C. 112
- 1986 S.C. App. LEXIS 436
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, under South Carolina law, plaintiff can plead in the alternative but cannot receive a double recovery
- holding that “[i]n many instances,... the case can go to the jury on all causes of action supported by the evidence at trial, with election required after verdict but before judgment is entered.”
- the fraudulent act is any act characterized by dishonesty in fact, unfair dealing, or the unlawful appropriation of another’s property by design
- action for breach of contract accompanied by fraudulent act is not based on the same elements as the action in tort for fraud and deceit
- the fraudulent act is any act characterized by dishonesty in fact or unfair dealing
- punitive damages are available for ‘‘breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act,’’ which is cause of action that does not require plaintiff ‘‘to allege the elements of [common-law] fraud and deceit’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Sanders, Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.