Skip to main content
· 9/2/1986

Harper v. Ethridge

Citations

  • 348 S.E.2d 374
  • 290 S.C. 112
  • 1986 S.C. App. LEXIS 436

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, under South Carolina law, plaintiff can plead in the alternative but cannot receive a double recovery
  • holding that “[i]n many instances,... the case can go to the jury on all causes of action supported by the evidence at trial, with election required after verdict but before judgment is entered.”
  • the fraudulent act is any act characterized by dishonesty in fact, unfair dealing, or the unlawful appropriation of another’s property by design
  • action for breach of contract accompanied by fraudulent act is not based on the same elements as the action in tort for fraud and deceit
  • the fraudulent act is any act characterized by dishonesty in fact or unfair dealing
  • punitive damages are available for ‘‘breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act,’’ which is cause of action that does not require plaintiff ‘‘to allege the elements of [common-law] fraud and deceit’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Sanders, Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.