Harper v. Ercole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petitioner must demonstrate how a medical condition actually prevented him from filing
• holding that, while “medical conditions, whether physical or psychiatric, can manifest extraordinary circumstances,” a petitioner must demonstrate how those circumstances prevented them from filing timely
• holding that a petitioner is “required to show reasonable diligence in pursuing his claim throughout the period he seeks to have tolled”
• stating that panel is bound by prior decisions of court unless reversed en banc or by Supreme Court
• explaining that, to “secure equitable tolling,” a party “must . . . demonstrate that [extraordinary] circumstances caused him to miss the original filing deadline”
• finding that a ninety-eight-day period of hospitalization equitably tolled the statute of limitation for a federal habeas petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).