Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pursuant to § 1-2z, court resorts to legislative history and genealogy only after concluding statute is vague and ambiguous
• pursuant to § l-2z, court resorts to legislative history and genealogy only after concluding statute is vague and ambiguous
• ‘‘[w]e are obligated to search for a construction of the statute that makes a harmonious whole of its constit- uent parts’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• ‘‘[w]e are obligated to search for a construction of the statute that makes a harmonious whole of its constit- uent parts’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• § 31-303 imposed 20 percentpenaltyin addition to existing remedy under General Statutes § 31-300
• ‘‘[because] the statute yields no plain meaning . . . we turn to [its] genealogy and legislative history . . . to answer the issue raised in this appeal’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).