Harp v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding notice sufficient where the sentence required compliance with the rules of a diversion center and the defendant was advised of the specific rules when he later arrived at the diversion center
• “ ‘[T]o expect a probationer to abide by terms and conditions of which he has no knowledge would be an unconstitutional deprivation of due process.’ ” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stephens v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-10-03· cited 42×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-02-07· cited 12×
• Clowers v. Sikes
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-06-12· cited 11×
• Cordle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-01-29· cited 3×
• In the Interest of B. K.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-09-07· cited 3×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnston v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1974-05-21· cited 43×
• Tabb v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-11-12· cited 39×
• Mulkey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-07-02· cited 33×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1977-05-09· cited 27×
• Adams v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-04-22· cited 15×
• Hinton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1973-01-22· cited 13×
• Strickland v. Foundation Life Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1973-09-12· cited 10×
• Niehaus v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-04-04· cited 9×
• Montgomery v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-04-10· cited 5×
• Harrell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-04-13· cited 5×
• McLoon v. AMOCO OIL COMPANY
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-07-03· cited 4×
• Shaw v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-10-29· cited 2×