Harp Advertising Illinois, Inc. v. Village of Chicago Ridge, Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that overbreadth doctrine “does not imply . . . that the requirement of standing to sue has been elided.”
• stating that a key ingredient of standing is a demonstration by the plaintiff that his injury likely will be redressed by a favorable decision
• suggesting that a party would have a sufficiently redressable injury to challenge a zoning code if it had expressed its intent to install a size- appropriate sign in the event that it prevailed in its challenge to the off-premises sign ban
• finding no redressability where a “valid” unchallenged law also precluded the plaintiff’s desired activ- ity
• finding no redressability where a “valid” unchallenged law also precluded the plaintiff’s desired activ- ity
• finding no redressability where a “valid” unchallenged law also precluded the plaintiff’s desired activ- ity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).