Harold Wasek v. Arrow Energy Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that male plaintiff’s hostile work environment claim failed 50 Case: 11-30770 Document: 00512389958 Page: 51 Date Filed: 09/27/2013 No. 11-30770 because there was no credible evidence that he was not heterosexual
• holding that a transfer can result in an adverse employment action where the transferred employee’s career prospects are significantly limited
• holding that an inference of causation based on timing alone may be “extinguished” by an “intervening legitimate reason to discipline”
• holding that “complaining about allegedly unlawful conduct” that plaintiff has “a reasonable and good faith belief” is in violation of Title VII qualifies as “protected activity”
• holding that an employee who complained about harassment and later left without authorization had himself caused an intervening event giving his employer a reason to discipline him
• holding that an employee who complained about harassment and later left his worksite without authorization caused an intervening event that gave his employer a reason to discipline him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).