Skip to main content
· 8/18/1988

Harold W. GRANDCHAMP and Peter J. Seewald, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC., Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 854 F.2d 381
  • 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1098
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11257
  • 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,906
  • 1988 WL 84932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Colorado law and holding that employer’s refusal to offer new positions to 49–year-old employees after their former positions were eliminated did not rise to level of outrageousness necessary to support intentional infliction claim
  • “It is well-settled under Colorado law that discharge from employment, without more, is not outrageous conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holloway, Anderson, Dumbauld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.