Harold S. Hemstreet v. Spiegel, Inc., Recognition Equipment Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “there is a compelling public interest and policy in upholding and enforcing settlement agreements voluntarily entered into.”
• holding \there is a compelling public interest and policy in upholding and enforcing settlement agreements voluntarily entered into.\
• finding that the law favors the settlement of litigation more strongly than the furtherance of federal patent policy
• federal patent policy enunciated in Lear does not also override policy in favor of settlement of disputes
• “The law strongly favors settlement of litigation, and there is a compelling public interest and policy in up- holding and enforcing settlement agreements voluntarily entered into.”
• “The law strongly favors settlement of litigation, and there is a com- pelling public interest and policy in upholding and enforc- ing settlement agreements voluntarily entered into.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).