Harold Reed Hoke, M.D. v. Retail Credit Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we interpret the Fair Credit Reporting Act liberally in light of \its broad remedial purposes\
• explaining that the Fourth Circuit interprets the FCRA liberally in light of its “broad remedial purposes”
• explaining that the Fourth Circuit interprets the FCRA in light of its “broad remedial purpose,” but that a consumer report must fit the consumer purpose defined in the statute
• finding employment purpose where credit report was obtained as part of doctor’s licensing procedure
• finding character and mode of living clause “virtually limitless”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).