· 12/3/1980
Harold Omar Mack v. United States
Citations
- 635 F.2d 20
- 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 11751
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the determination of voluntariness is “[a]t the core” of Rule 11
- vacating plea accepted in violation of Criminal Rule 11, and remanding for rehearing and opportunity to plead anew
- prejudice inhered in the violation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 itself where violation was a failure to determine that the defendant understood the nature of the charges
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffin, Bownes, Wyzanski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.