Skip to main content
· 1/9/2004

Harold Newton v. Mike Kemna

Citations

  • 354 F.3d 776
  • 63 Fed. R. Serv. 299
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 232
  • 2004 WL 42228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the court must hold “a hearing if the petitioner has alleged disputed facts which, if proved, would entitle him to habeas relief,” but “the court may deny an evidentiary hearing if such a hearing would not assist in resolving the petitioner’s claim.”
  • discussing Bracy and 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Rule 6(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Beam, Bye

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.