Skip to main content
· 5/23/1986

Harold McKelvey v. At & T Technologies, Inc.

Citations

  • 789 F.2d 1518
  • 5 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 452
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25277
  • 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,303
  • 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “decision to dismiss for want of prosecution lies within the trial court’s discretion”
  • noting that the “decision to dismiss for want of prosecution lies within the trial court’s discretion”
  • noting that the “decision to dismiss for want of prosecution lies within the trial court’s discretion”
  • noting that the “decision to dismiss for want of prosecution lies within the trial court’s discretion”
  • noting that the “decision to dismiss for want of prosecution lies within the trial court’s discretion”
  • noting that the “decision to dismiss for want of prosecution lies within the trial court’s discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Henderson, Hill, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.