Harold Martin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting an employer is deemed to have actual notice of a dangerous condition if an employee created or was aware of the hazard
• noting an employer is deemed to have actual notice of a dangerous condition if an employee created or was aware of the hazard
• interpreting Missouri law to find that operation of a self-service store “creates an affirmative duty to anticipate and, exercising due care, prevent or seek out those dangerous conditions, then protect or warn customers once the particular danger is found”
• “Though the self-service store instruction may not be a model of clarity, we find that the instructions, taken as a whole, adequately charged the jury under Missouri law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).