Harold Jetter v. Knothe Corp., Richard Bern, Brian Minkoff, Ely Minkoff and William Nomberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that ʺ[t]he same‐actor rationale has far less applicabilityʺ when employers hire individuals with a goal other than retaining them as employees
• declining to apply “same actor” principle from Grady where the decisionmaker’s “collateral incentive” to hire plaintiff was to acquire plaintiff’s company
• distinguishing Grady because the “same actor” rationale is usually applied in circumstances where the employer did not have a collateral incentive to hire a particular candidate unlike in cases where the employer had to hire the plaintiff to acquire plaintiffs company
• plaintiff was properly terminated for “disregard of company rules and practices”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).