Skip to main content
· 2/3/1995

Harold Hobbs v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Co-I Robinson, Maximum Security Unit Co-I Tate, Maximum Security Unit

Citations

  • 46 F.3d 864
  • 31 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 380
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2106
  • 1995 WL 39968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • inmate&s emotional distress was sufficiently serious to support Eighth Amendment failure-to-protect claim; citing Hudson, 503 U.S. at 16 (Blackmun, J., concurring) (“#[p]ain& in its ordinary meaning surely includes a notion of psychological harm”)
  • inmate&s emotional distress was sufficiently serious to support Eighth Amendment failure-to-protect claim; citing Hudson, 503 U.S. at 16 (Blackmun, J., concurring) (“#[p]ain& in its ordinary meaning surely includes a notion of psychological harm”)
  • cautious approval of pre-trial evidentiary hearing; standard to be applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Gibson, Fagg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.