Harold Hobbs v. A.L. Lockhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that questions regarding the admissibility of evidence are reviewable in a habeas corpus proceeding if “the asserted error . . . was so prejudicial as to deny due process”
• addressing and then rejecting a section 2254 petitioner's argument that the cumulative effect of admitting other crimes evidence tainted the fundamental fairness of the entire trial
• totality of error claim rejected in case in which court found only one harmless error
• prosecutor's statement that defendant's call to his lawyer was a \telling sign\ subject to harmless error analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).