Skip to main content
· 6/29/2021

Harold Haswell v. Cach, Llc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding “it was entirely proper for the jury to take into consideration [the property’s] enhanced value [from existing public marketplace project]” “in view of the fact that there was no definite purpose manifested by the City to take [the subject property]” until later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.