Harold E. Harrington v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that we hold responsible \all with responsibility and authority to avoid the default which constitutes a violation of the statute\
• noting that we hold responsible “all with responsibility and authority to avoid the default which constitutes a violation of the statute”
• holding responsible “all with responsibility and authority to avoid the default which constitutes a violation of the statute”
• affirming jury finding of responsibility \[s]ince the jury could properly have found that [the taxpayer] was the person with responsibility for the taxes\
• objections were preserved by brief post-charge statement on the record, where parties had discussed the requested instructions with the judge at length but off the record
• objections were preserved by brief post-charge statement on the record, where parties had discussed the requested instructions with the judge at length but off the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).