Skip to main content
· 5/31/2001

Harold Dotson v. Delta Consolidated Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 251 F.3d 780
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11218
  • 80 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,588
  • 85 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1673
  • 2001 WL 579729

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the party moving for summary judgment bears the burden “to show ‘that there is an absence of evidence to support the non-moving party’s ease” ’
  • the party moving for summary judgment bears the burden “to show ‘that there is an absence of evidence to support the non-moving party’s case” ’
  • “[T]he nonmoving party must affirmatively demonstrate by specific fac tual allegations that a genuine issue of material fact exists for trial.”
  • “[T]he nonmoving party must affirmatively demonstrate by specific factual allegations that a genuine issue of material fact exists for trial.”
  • “A disputed fact is material if it might affect the outcome of the suit such that a finding of that fact is necessary and relevant to the proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Bright, Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.