Harold D. Wallick v. Eric B. Inman, M.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was sufficient evidence to submit the issue of “permanent and substantial physical deformity” to the jury where treating doctors and experts testified that the plaintiff’s spinal anatomy changed as a result of the surgeries
• concluding that there was sufficient evidence to submit the issue of “permanent and substantial physical deformity” to the jury where treating doctors and experts testified that the plaintiff’s spinal anatomy changed as a result of the surgeries
• “The danger of unfair prejudice is readily apparent in this case. Setters's counsel used evidence of the license revocation in such a way that it invited the jury to draw an improper inference about Durrani's credibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).