Skip to main content
· 4/30/1990

Harold and Joeanne Antwine v. Prudential Bache Securities, Inc.

Citations

  • 899 F.2d 410
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6743
  • 1990 WL 41986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that courts “should defer to the arbitrator's decision when possible.”
  • implicitly reviewing de novo district court’s refusal to vacate award based on panel’s alleged noncompliance with securities arbitration rules
  • “It has long been settled that arbitrators are not required to disclose or explain the reasons underlying an award.”
  • “Judicial review of an arbitration award is extraordinarily narrow.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, King, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.