Skip to main content
· 5/19/2014

Haro-Munoz v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 2325
  • 189 L. Ed. 2d 200
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3673
  • 572 U.S. 1129
  • 2014 WL 1575733
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]here, as here, there is no finding of disability under step two, SSR 83–20 is inapplicable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.