Harney v. Heller

Citations

• 47 Cal. 15

Syllabus

<p>Resolution on Intention to Imfbove Stbeet.—A resolution passed by the Board of Supervisors of San Francisco declaring their intention to improve a street, need not contain a complete plan and specifications of the proposed improvement. The resolution of intention need not describe the work with any more exactness than it is described in the law itself.</p> <p>Resionstbance Against Stbeet Improvement.—Parties who do not remonstrate against a proposed street improvement in San Francisco, cannot claim the benefit of a remonstrance filed by other parties.</p> <p>Idem.—If a remonstrance to a street improvement in San Francisco is filed with the Board of Supervisors, and it is referred to a committee, and the Board, before the committee reports, and without any action directly on the petition, directs the work to be done, it is practically a passing upon and a decision against the remonstrance.</p>