Skip to main content
· 12/10/2010

Harmston v. City and County of San Francisco

Citations

  • 627 F.3d 1273
  • 2010 D.A.R. 18
  • 78 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 234
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 25253
  • 111 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a remand order is an appealable final decision for purposes of § 1291 because it concludes the proceedings in federal court
  • “Congress has decided that ensuring finality eventually becomes more important than strictly enforcing Rule 58’s separate document requirement.”
  • “[I]f a district court remands a case to state court for any reason other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction, its remand order is appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.”
  • discussing the 12 || deadline to appeal
  • discussing 20 the deadline to appeal
  • discretionary refusal of supplemental jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Bybee, Panner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.