Skip to main content
· 8/2/2001

Harms v. Laboratory Corp. of America

Citations

  • 155 F. Supp. 2d 891
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11365
  • 2001 WL 877234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the less stringent federal summary judgment standard to conclude that the damages sought were speculative
  • declining to grant summary judgment on plaintiff’s emotional distress claim, based on the conclusion that “[a]ny concerns about a pregnancy or complications that arise during that pregnancy clearly affect the woman who carries the fetus”
  • granting summary judgment as to the plaintiffs’ claim for “damages for risk of future harm to a fetus” due to Rh-sensitization because “it is impossible to determine without speculation what sort of injury—if any—the fetus would suffer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alesia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.