Skip to main content
· 6/17/1925

Harmony Grove Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 2 B.T.A. 75
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that \[m]aintenance and cure is the maritime analog to land-based industrial insurance paying an injured seaman's medical expenses (cure) and compensation in lieu of wages (maintenance) for injuries incurred in service of a ship\
  • holding that trial court erred by excluding letters as hearsay where letters were timely disclosed under ER 904 and party opposing admission “could offer no compelling reason for its failure to timely object”
  • punitive damages not available in action for failure to pay maintenance and cure
  • “We do not believe where federal law requires the maritime employer and seaman to agree in writing on the length and terms of employment we will permit variation of the terms of the agreement by parol evidence.”
  • documentary evidence admissible absent an objection
  • documentary evidence admissible absent an objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James, Smith, Teussell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.