Skip to main content
· 2/20/1890

Harmon v. Railroad Co.

Citations

  • 32 S.C. 127
  • 10 S.E. 877
  • 1890 S.C. LEXIS 21

Syllabus

<p>1. In action to recover damages for cattle killed by a train of cars, the railroad company, defendant, introduced expert witnesses, who testified as to the distance within which a train of cars could be stopped. Held, that it was competent for plaintiff to prove in reply by non-expert witnesses the distance within which they had seen a train stopped, and that the trial judge erred in saying to the jury that such reply testimony had nothing to do with the case.</p> <p>2.' The enclosure and maintenance of a pasture on one’s own land across a railroad track is not unlawful, and, therefore, where the landowner’s stock was killed at that point by a train of cars, the trial judge erred in suggesting to the jury that the existence of this pasture might constitute contributory negligence.</p>

Judges: McIver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.