Skip to main content
· 12/21/1904

Harmon v. Goggins

Citations

  • 19 S.D. 34
  • 101 N.W. 1088
  • 1904 S.D. LEXIS 109

Syllabus

<p>1. On an issue as to whether plaintiff or defendant was the owner of 'oer- . tain.real estate in fee simple, assignments of mortgages on the property to plaintiff were, properly excluded as not relevant to the issu,e.</p> <p>2. Where, in an action to determine whether plaintiff or defendant was the owner of certain land in fee simple, the parties did not claim title from the same grantor, and the plaintiff was notin possession and failed to ■ connect himself with the paramount title, and defendant was in actual .possession, a judgment in favor of defendant was proper.</p>

Judges: Haney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.