Skip to main content
· 7/5/2000

Harmon v. Apfel

Citations

  • 103 F. Supp. 2d 869
  • 2000 WL 949116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a reviewing court “is not a soothsayer and cannot base its conclusion on surmise and conjecture as to the reasons the Commissioner disregarded new, additional evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.