· 7/5/2000
Harmon v. Apfel
Citations
- 103 F. Supp. 2d 869
- 2000 WL 949116
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a reviewing court “is not a soothsayer and cannot base its conclusion on surmise and conjecture as to the reasons the Commissioner disregarded new, additional evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.