Harman v. Housing Finance Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• hearing examiner did not abuse his discretion by refusing to include in homeowner’s monthly income calculation her representations of projected future income from her decorating business
• stating “we can find no abuse of discretion in the examiner’s refusing to include a possibility of future income in calculation of present monthly net income . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).