Harman v. Harman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a breach is not material unless “the act 17 failed to be performed [goes] to the root of the contract or . . . render[s] the performance of 18 the rest of the contract a thing different in substance from that which was contracted for” 19 (alterations in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).