Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. Blumling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the trial court addressed the issue of whether an “other insurance clause” violated the intendment of the Uninsured Motorist Law
• finding that the trial court addressed the issue of whether an \other insurance clause\ violated the intendment of the Uninsured Motorist Law
• stating that such statutes are “designed to give monetary protection to that ... large group of persons who ... suffer grave injuries through negligent use of those highways by others.”
• automobile insurer eould not avoid its statutorily imposed liability by unilaterally inserting a liability-limiting clause
• automobile insurer could not avoid its statutorily imposed liability by unilaterally inserting a liability-limiting clause
• uninsured motorist statute is “designed to give monetary protection to that ever changing and tragically large group of persons who while lawfully using the highways themselves suffer grave injury through the negligent use of those highways by others.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).