Harley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while the variance prejudiced defendant’s substantial rights related to his PDWDCF conviction, his assault conviction was upheld because “the exact nature and description of the instrument used during the altercation is not an essential element of the crime”
• “As to the assault charge, the exact nature and description of the instrument used during the altercation is not an essential element of the crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1998-05-28· cited 27×
• Robinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1991-12-04· cited 19×
• Walls v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-06-01· cited 18×
• Coffield v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2002-04-10· cited 12×
• Kornegay v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1991-09-11· cited 3×
• State v. Kornegay
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1989-10-31· cited 1×
• State v. Toth
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2000-08-28· cited 1×
• Addison v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2019-04-18
• State v. Brown
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2022-06-16
• State v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2025-05-23