Skip to main content
· 4/30/1888

Harley v. Lebanon M. Ins.

Citations

  • 120 Pa. 182
  • 21 W.N.C. 403
  • 13 A. 833
  • 1888 Pa. LEXIS 470

Syllabus

<p>In an action of debt upon a policy of fire insurance, brought by the insured for the use of an assignee, the declaration averred substantially that the defendant insured the properly of a firm composed of D, J. and P. D., in the firm name of P. D., by a covenant with the assured, “ their and his executors, administrators and assigns; ” an assignment by P. D. of his interest in the property and policy to his partner D. J.; a subsequent renewal of the policy with D. J. and a waiver thereby of a provision for the assent of the defendant to the transfer. Profert of the policy was made, but oyer was not craved: Held,</p> <p>1. That, oyer not having been craved, no part of the policy appeared to the court but that upon which the plaintiff had declared.</p> <p>2. That the declaration exhibited a good cause of action, quite sufficient to sustain a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • held pollution control devices were “used and useful” where such equipment was necessary for continued operation of plants according to a federal consent decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Gordon, Green, Paxson, Stebbett, Sterrett, Trunkey, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.